Robotic Arm-assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty is More Cost-Effective Than Manual Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Markov Model Analysis
Authors: Maldonado DR, Go CC, Kyin C, Rosinsky PJ, Shapira J, Lall AC, Domb BG
Background
Robotic arm-assisted (RAA) total hip arthroplasty offers improved precision, but its cost-effectiveness compared to manual THA is uncertain.
Methods
Using a Markov model, costs and outcomes of RAA THA versus manual THA were compared over 5 years, from Medicare and private insurer perspectives.
Key Findings
- RAA THA was more cost-effective, saving money and providing slightly better health outcomes.
- Both Medicare and private payers benefit economically from RAA THA.
Conclusions
Robotic-assisted THA is a valuable, cost-effective alternative to manual THA with potential for improved clinical results.
What Does This Mean for Providers?
Incorporating robotic arm-assisted technology into THA may improve precision and patient outcomes while reducing overall costs. Providers should consider adopting RAA THA where available to enhance value-based care and optimize resource utilization.